Meaning
Protective provisions in takeover codes limit the actions a target company board may take once a bid is imminent. An anti-frustration clause exists to ensure that shareholders decide the outcome of a takeover rather than the directors. This provision restricts the board from issuing new shares or selling major assets while a bona fide offer is pending.
It operates as a check on management power during periods of corporate transition.
Regulatory Constraint
Common law jurisdictions often apply these rules during the offer period to maintain market neutrality. The anti-frustration clause prevents management from implementing defensive measures that might discourage a potential buyer. If the board wishes to take such actions, they must first obtain specific approval from a general meeting of shareholders.
Such oversight prevents directors from protecting their own positions at the expense of shareholder value.
Prohibited Action
Directors are generally barred from actions that would result in the offer failing or the company structure changing fundamentally. Under the anti-frustration clause, the target company cannot enter into contracts outside the ordinary course of business or buy back its own shares. These restrictions apply as soon as the board has reason to believe a bona fide offer is imminent.
Violation of these rules can lead to regulatory sanctions or litigation from the bidding party. The target board is effectively sidelined from obstructive behavior once a transaction enters the public phase.
Decision Authority
Ultimate power over the success of the bid rests with the equity holders. By enforcing an anti-frustration clause, the regulatory framework ensures that the owners of the company determine its future ownership.