Meaning
Interim court orders designed to preserve specific assets in which the applicant claims a pre-existing proprietary interest protect the claimant’s rights prior to a full trial. Unlike a freezing order, which only prevents a defendant from dissipating their own assets, proprietary injunctions assert that the assets being held actually belong to the applicant. The order prevents the defendant from disposing of or dealing with those specific assets.
This prevents the defendant from mixing or wasting the property before its ownership is decided.
Asset Preservation
Direct control over the contested property is the primary benefit of this form of relief. Since proprietary injunctions target specific assets, they prevent the defendant from using those funds to pay for legal fees or ordinary living expenses. This is a major advantage over general freezing orders.
It ensures the asset remains intact.
Evidentiary Standard
Requirements for obtaining this order include proving ownership. To secure proprietary injunctions, the applicant must trace the assets directly to the defendant’s hands.
Equitable Remedy
Judicial assessment of the balance of convenience determines whether the order should be granted. Since the applicant claims ownership, the court is more willing to grant proprietary injunctions than general freezing orders. The court considers whether the respondent will suffer irreparable harm if deprived of the assets, balancing this against the risk that the assets will disappear if the injunction is refused.